Re: Hexadecimal digits

From: Luke-Jr (luke@dashjr.org)
Date: Fri Jun 04 2010 - 14:35:24 CDT

  • Next message: John H. Jenkins: "Re: Hexadecimal digits"

    On Friday 04 June 2010 02:23:46 pm Michael Everson wrote:
    > On 4 Jun 2010, at 21:14, Luke-Jr wrote:
    > > Sumerian is basically bar counting, and the others are all base 10.
    > > Hardly a wide variety, just different symbols meaning the same thing.
    > > None of which provide 16 digits needed for a hexadecimal numbering
    > > system.
    >
    > One mentioned 0123456789ABCDEF, and the fact that one has software already
    > which does sums in this hexadecimal notation.

    That works for software, but not so much for human communication.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jun 04 2010 - 14:37:03 CDT