Re: Latin Script

From: Tulasi (tulasird@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Jun 28 2010 - 22:55:14 CDT

  • Next message: Mark Davis ☕: "Re: Latin Script"

    Looks like Unicode did not create any name for any Latin letter/symbol
    with LATIN in its name :-')

    Am I correct?

    Is there a mailing list for ISO/IEC ?

    > I don't think it's necessary to post these glyphs to the public list.

    Better to do like Edward Cherlin, i.e., type the symbol after the name.

    e.g., LATIN SMALL LETTER PHI (ɸ)

    That way an illiterate like me can quickly see the letter/symbol along
    with its name, without additional research.

    > The merger between Unicode and ISO 10646 caused a few character names in
    > Unicode to be changed to match the 10646 names.

    My I know these letters/symbols with names please?

    Tulasi
    PS: Thanks Doug, especially for posting the links

    From: Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org>
    Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 16:09:41 -0600
    Subject: Re: Latin Script
    To: Unicode Mailing List <unicode@unicode.org>
    Cc: Tulasi <tulasird@gmail.com>

    "Tulasi" <tulasird at gmail dot com> wrote:

    >> U+00AA FEMININE ORDINAL INDICATOR (which does not contain "LATIN") is
    >> considered part of the Latin script, while U+271D LATIN CROSS (which
    >> does) is considered common to all scripts.
    >
    > Can you post both symbols please, thanks?

    I can point you to http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0080.pdf , which
    includes a glyph for U+00AA, and
    http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U2700.pdf , which includes a glyph for
    U+271D. I don't think it's necessary to post these glyphs to the public
    list.

    > Trying to know who among ISO and Unicode first created the names' list
    > for Latin-script is not an indication of obsession :-')
    >
    > So among Unicode and ISO/IEC, who first created ISO/IEC 8859-1 &
    > ISO/IEC 8859-2 letters/symbols names with each name with LATIN in it?

    Most of the characters in the various parts of ISO 8859 were originally
    standardized before Unicode or ISO 10646, so the names were probably
    either created by the ISO/IEC subcommittees responsible for those parts,
    or found in earlier standards and adopted as-is.

    The merger between Unicode and ISO 10646 caused a few character names in
    Unicode to be changed to match the 10646 names.

    --
    Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org
    RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ is dot gd slash 2kf0s ­
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jun 28 2010 - 22:59:31 CDT