Re: Latin Script

From: Doug Ewell (doug@ewellic.org)
Date: Mon Jun 28 2010 - 23:51:20 CDT

Next message: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Latin Script"

Previous message: Mark Davis ☕: "Re: Latin Script"
In reply to: Tulasi: "Re: Latin Script"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

"Tulasi" <tulasird at gmail dot com> wrote:

> Looks like Unicode did not create any name for any Latin letter/symbol
> with LATIN in its name :-')
>
> Am I correct?

Probably not, if you take into account something like U+2C70 (Ɒ) LATIN
CAPITAL LETTER TURNED ALPHA, which was added in Unicode 5.2, or U+A78D
(Ɥ) LATIN CAPITAL LETTER TURNED H, which is being added to Unicode 6.0.

I have no idea what sort of knowledge you are trying to gather with
this.

--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org
RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ is dot gd slash 2kf0s

Next message: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Latin Script"
Previous message: Mark Davis ☕: "Re: Latin Script"
In reply to: Tulasi: "Re: Latin Script"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jun 28 2010 - 23:54:31 CDT