Re: How to encode reversed section sign?

From: Janusz S. BieÒ (jsbien@mimuw.edu.pl)
Date: Fri Aug 06 2010 - 10:40:48 CDT

Next message: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Accessing alternate glyphs from plain text (from Re: Draft Proposal to add Variation Sequences for Latin and Cyrillic letters)"

Previous message: Andr√© Szabolcs Szelp: "Re: How to encode reversed section sign?"
In reply to: Jo√≥ √Åd√°m: "Re: How to encode reversed section sign?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 Joó Ádám <ceriak@gmail.com> wrote:

> Nevertheless, our typesetter had those types for some reason. Or do
> you think that – given its different style – it was only a glyph
> variant of some other font?

That's what André suggested and it might be true.

Looks like nobody was interested in this question before so I have to
make my own investigations :-) I've located only one book prepared by
the same typesetter, but it seems it does not contain any form of the
section sign.

Best regards

Janusz

-- 
                     ,   
dr hab. Janusz S. Bien, prof. UW -  Uniwersytet Warszawski (Katedra Lingwistyki Formalnej)
Prof. Janusz S. Bien - Warsaw University (Department of Formal Linguistics)
jsbien@uw.edu.pl, jsbien@mimuw.edu.pl, http://fleksem.klf.uw.edu.pl/~jsbien/

Next message: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Accessing alternate glyphs from plain text (from Re: Draft Proposal to add Variation Sequences for Latin and Cyrillic letters)"
In reply to: Jo√≥ √Åd√°m: "Re: How to encode reversed section sign?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Aug 06 2010 - 10:42:36 CDT