Re: CSUR Tonal

From: Kenneth Whistler (kenw@sybase.com)
Date: Tue Aug 17 2010 - 14:09:41 CDT

Next message: Doug Ewell: "RE: Deprecated characters in Unicode 5.1 vs Unicode 5.2"

Previous message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Deprecated characters in Unicode 5.1 vs Unicode 5.2"
Maybe in reply to: Luke-Jr: "Re: CSUR Tonal"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> could you please simply give your opinion/decision on this matter
> so people can begin using Tonal numbers in documents without risking a change
> to the standardized PUA usage?
^^^^^^^^^^^^

I have no opinion about the details of your proposed CSUR
registration, but in a Unicode context it would be best
not to be talking about "standardized" PUA usage.

Specified, o.k.

Agreed upon, o.k.

But in a Unicode context, the single salient aspect of PUA
usage is that it is *not* standardized, but is instead open
to user agreement for non-standard usage.

--Ken

Next message: Doug Ewell: "RE: Deprecated characters in Unicode 5.1 vs Unicode 5.2"
Previous message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Deprecated characters in Unicode 5.1 vs Unicode 5.2"
Maybe in reply to: Luke-Jr: "Re: CSUR Tonal"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Aug 17 2010 - 14:12:01 CDT