Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa at gmail dot com> wrote:
>> I thought this property was mutable, and indeed that even some
>> assigned characters had had their Bidi_Class changed over the years.
>> I could be wrong.
>
> Perhaps you refer to this:
> http://www.unicode.org/versions/corrigendum8.html ?
No, I didn't think it required that much fanfare. I thought this had
happened for existing characters, from one version of Unicode to the
next, without a corrigendum. So maybe I was wrong after all.
-- Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 www.ewellic.org | www.facebook.com/doug.ewell | @DougEwell Received on Fri Aug 19 2011 - 11:51:05 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Aug 19 2011 - 11:51:05 CDT