Re: RTL PUA?

On 08/20/2011 10:54 AM, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
> On 08/19/2011 10:05 PM, Mark Davis ☕ wrote:
>> All of the property assignments to PUA characters (except the GC) are
>> purely informative.
>
> I just now noticed that you had excepted the GC in the above. Why is
> that? How are applications supposed to handle combining marks etc if in
> the PUA?

Mark, can you please reply to the above --

It seems that while it is true that GC=Co should be retained *in the
standard* to clearly identify the character as a PUA character, the
applications will still by changing that GC to Lo, Mc, Mn, No etc for
their internal private-agreement processing. So what is the exact nature
of your excepting the GC in your statement above?

-- 
Shriramana Sharma