GPL != "do what you want with them" :) For example what Christoph pointed out. You may want to consider a more permissive license if "do what you want" is your intent.
-Shawn
(as myself)
From: unicode-bounce_at_unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce_at_unicode.org] On Behalf Of James Kass
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 7:17 AM
To: unicode_at_unicode.org
Cc: luke_at_dashjr.org
Subject: Re: Code2000 on SourceForge (was Re: [indic] Re: Lack of Complex script rendering support on Android)
License already included in SourceForge download, namely GPLv3.
James Kass
--- On Fri, 2/3/12, Luke-Jr <luke_at_dashjr.org<mailto:luke_at_dashjr.org>> wrote:
From: Luke-Jr <luke_at_dashjr.org<mailto:luke_at_dashjr.org>>
Subject: Re: Code2000 on SourceForge (was Re: [indic] Re: Lack of Complex script rendering support on Android)
To: unicode_at_unicode.org<mailto:unicode_at_unicode.org>
Cc: "James Kass" <jameskass_at_att.net<mailto:jameskass_at_att.net>>
Date: Friday, February 3, 2012, 3:09 PM
On Friday, February 03, 2012 9:52:26 AM James Kass wrote:
> All fonts are now of course freeware - simply do what you want with them
> all.
"Freeware" isn't afaik a legal term.
Could you slap some kind of license on them?
The CC0 or MIT licenses sound like what you might want:
http://creativecommons.org/choose/zero/
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php
Received on Fri Feb 03 2012 - 11:06:55 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Feb 03 2012 - 11:06:56 CST