RE: Code2000 on SourceForge (was Re: [indic] Re: Lack of Complex script rendering support on Android)

From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 22:48:10 +0530

FWIW there are many other free hosting services than SourceForge...

Sent from my Android phone
On Feb 3, 2012 10:44 PM, "Shawn Steele" <Shawn.Steele_at_microsoft.com> wrote:

> GPL != “do what you want with them” J For example what Christoph
> pointed out. You may want to consider a more permissive license if “do
> what you want” is your intent.****
>
> ** **
>
> -Shawn****
>
> (as myself)****
>
> *From:* unicode-bounce_at_unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce_at_unicode.org] *On
> Behalf Of *James Kass
> *Sent:* Friday, February 03, 2012 7:17 AM
> *To:* unicode_at_unicode.org
> *Cc:* luke_at_dashjr.org
> *Subject:* Re: Code2000 on SourceForge (was Re: [indic] Re: Lack of
> Complex script rendering support on Android)****
>
> ** **
>
> License already included in SourceForge download, namely GPLv3.****
>
> ** **
>
> James Kass****
>
>
> --- On *Fri, 2/3/12, Luke-Jr <luke_at_dashjr.org>* wrote:****
>
>
> From: Luke-Jr <luke_at_dashjr.org>
> Subject: Re: Code2000 on SourceForge (was Re: [indic] Re: Lack of Complex
> script rendering support on Android)
> To: unicode_at_unicode.org
> Cc: "James Kass" <jameskass_at_att.net>
> Date: Friday, February 3, 2012, 3:09 PM****
>
> On Friday, February 03, 2012 9:52:26 AM James Kass wrote:
> > All fonts are now of course freeware - simply do what you want with them
> > all.
>
> "Freeware" isn't afaik a legal term.
> Could you slap some kind of license on them?
> The CC0 or MIT licenses sound like what you might want:
> http://creativecommons.org/choose/zero/
> http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php****
>
> ** **
>
Received on Fri Feb 03 2012 - 11:21:17 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Feb 03 2012 - 11:21:24 CST