On 4/3/2012 6:57 PM, Karl Williamson wrote:
> Is it an error on the web site that this policy was in effect in 2.0,
> and it really should be 3.0? (as there no such decompositions in the
> data files starting in 3.0).
Yes.
>
> Or were these data files defective?
No.
The research to determine how far back some of the policies applied missed
the fact that this particular invariant for decomposition mappings was
introduced
as of Unicode 3.0 instead of Unicode 2.0. The documentation will be fixed.
--Ken
Received on Wed Apr 04 2012 - 12:39:28 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Apr 04 2012 - 12:39:30 CDT