William_J_G Overington <wjgo underscore 10009 at btinternet dot com>
wrote:
> Further to that point of order, is there any rule that absolutely
> prevents the deprecated status of a character or collection of
> characters being removed?
UTC has not ever shown the slightest inclination to do so, if that
answers your question.
> I feel that by hybridizing the suggestions of Doug and Philippe that
> an elegant solution using tags and an advanced format font could be
> designed.
I had forgotten that the Regional Indicator Symbols from U+1F1E6 through
U+1F1FF had already been encoded. You can create such a font today if
you like, mapping pairs of these symbols to a flag representing the
country with that ISO 3166-1 code element. See TUS 6.1, Section 5.10,
next-to-last subsection (page 534) for details.
-- Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA http://www.ewellic.org | @DougEwell Received on Thu May 31 2012 - 13:11:11 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu May 31 2012 - 13:11:11 CDT