On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:01:14 -0700
Asmus Freytag <asmusf_at_ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > On 03/21/2013 04:48 PM, Richard Wordingham wrote:
> >> However, distinguishing U+00B7 and U+0387 would fail spectacularly
> >> of the text had been converted to form NFC before you received it.
> That's a claim for which the evidence isn't yet solid and if it could
> be made solid would make that claim very interesting.
> However, even if standard canonical decompositions can be mistaken,
> tunneling isn't really a fool-proof answer, because it assumes that
> data didn't get normalized en route.
Isn't that the key part of what I said above?
Richard.
Received on Fri Mar 22 2013 - 20:19:42 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Mar 22 2013 - 20:19:43 CDT