Ken Whistler <kenwhistler at att dot net> wrote:
> The UTC is neither responsible for nor interested in a "standard way
> to encode flags unambiguously".
>
> [...]
>
> The Unicode Standard is not a vexillology standard -- nor will it ever
> be. It is a standard for the encoding and interchange of characters.
Even though I continue to believe there *should* be a vexillology
standard for encoding flags as unambiguously as practicable, I'm in
strong agreement that this is not a Unicode problem, or a character
problem, or even a CLDR problem.
If there were such a standard today, it might make sense for Unicode
and/or CLDR to adapt it for the emoji purposes we are discussing here.
But there isn't.
-- Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸Received on Thu Jul 02 2015 - 14:10:15 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jul 02 2015 - 14:10:15 CDT