As according to http://unicode.org/faq/emoji_dingbats.html , emoji
characters do not have single semantics. Which I think it is not what the
original proposer want? Or were I misunderstanding that
2015年7月29日 上午3:28於 "Doug Ewell" <doug_at_ewellic.org>寫道：
> gfb hjjhjh <c933103 at gmail dot com> wrote:
>
> > Probably if these symbols are to be added to unicode, it would better
> > to allocate blocks that are not belong to emoji for them.
>
> I'm curious what this is supposed to accomplish. It's not as though
> people viewing such a symbol on a screen or in print, or entering it on
> a phone keypad, will know or care what its Unicode code point is, or
> what other types of symbols have nearby code points.
>
> The Miscellaneous Symbols block contains U+2620 SKULL AND CROSSBONES,
> U+2623 BIOHAZARD SIGN, and U+263A WHITE SMILING FACE.
>
> --
> Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸
>
>
>
Received on Tue Jul 28 2015 - 15:27:19 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jul 28 2015 - 15:27:19 CDT