That's what Mr. Overington wants, but he's not the original proposer.
The proposal by Hiroyuki Komatsu
<http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2015/15197r-emoji-food-allergens.pdf> does
not say anything of the sort, and by unifying some with existing
characters implies otherwise.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 1:26 PM, gfb hjjhjh <c933103_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> As according to http://unicode.org/faq/emoji_dingbats.html , emoji
> characters do not have single semantics. Which I think it is not what the
> original proposer want? Or were I misunderstanding that
>
> 2015年7月29日 上午3:28於 "Doug Ewell" <doug_at_ewellic.org>寫道：
>>
>> gfb hjjhjh <c933103 at gmail dot com> wrote:
>>
>> > Probably if these symbols are to be added to unicode, it would better
>> > to allocate blocks that are not belong to emoji for them.
>>
>> I'm curious what this is supposed to accomplish. It's not as though
>> people viewing such a symbol on a screen or in print, or entering it on
>> a phone keypad, will know or care what its Unicode code point is, or
>> what other types of symbols have nearby code points.
>>
>> The Miscellaneous Symbols block contains U+2620 SKULL AND CROSSBONES,
>> U+2623 BIOHAZARD SIGN, and U+263A WHITE SMILING FACE.
>>
>> --
>> Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸
>>
>>
>
Received on Tue Jul 28 2015 - 17:28:43 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jul 28 2015 - 17:28:43 CDT