Re: Concise term for non-ASCII Unicode characters

Sean Leonard wrote:

> Additionally as Peter stated, an expression including "Basic Latin
> block" (e.g., characters beyond the Basic Latin block) could work.

I was thinking that something like "non–Basic-Latin Unicode" might be
useful. It avoids the confusion of referring to ASCII as a range of code
points instead of a separate encoding standard.

--
Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸