Re: Concise term for non-ASCII Unicode characters

Hello Doug,

On 2015/09/22 00:42, Doug Ewell wrote:

> I was thinking that something like "non–Basic-Latin Unicode" might be

Is that non-Basic Latin or not Basic-Latin?

> useful. It avoids the confusion of referring to ASCII as a range of code
> points instead of a separate encoding standard.

But as a three-component term with unclear structure, it's confusing by
itself.

Regards, Martin.
Received on Mon Sep 21 2015 - 19:00:20 CDT