Should U+3248 ... U+324F be wide characters?

EastAsianWidth.txt contains:

3248..324F;A # No [8] CIRCLED NUMBER TEN ON BLACK SQUARE..CIRCLED NUMBER EIGHTY ON BLACK SQUARE

i.e. it classifies the width of the characters at codepoints
between 3248 and 324F as ambiguous.

Is this really correct? Shouldn’t they be “W”, i.e. wide?

In most fonts these characters seem to be square shaped wide characters.

-- 
Mike FABIAN <mfabian_at_redhat.com>