RE: Unicode education in Schools

From: Peter Constable via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 05:14:42 +0000

I thought Javascript had a UCS-2 understanding of Unicode strings. Has it managed to progress beyond that?


Peter


From: Unicode [mailto:unicode-bounces_at_unicode.org] On Behalf Of David Starner via Unicode
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 5:18 PM
To: Unicode Mailing List <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Subject: Fwd: Unicode education in Schools


---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: David Starner <prosfilaes_at_gmail.com<mailto:prosfilaes_at_gmail.com>>
Date: Thu, Aug 24, 2017, 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: Unicode education in Schools
To: Richard Wordingham <richard.wordingham_at_ntlworld.com<mailto:richard.wordingham_at_ntlworld.com>>


On Thu, Aug 24, 2017, 5:26 PM Richard Wordingham via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org<mailto:unicode_at_unicode.org>> wrote:
Just steer them away from UTF-16! (And vigorously prohibit the very
concept of UCS-2).

Richard.

Steer them away from reinventing the wheel. If they use Java, use Java strings. If they're using GTK, use strings compatible with GTK. If they're writing JavaScript, use JavaScript strings. There's basically no system without Unicode strings or that they would be better off rewriting the wheel.
Received on Fri Aug 25 2017 - 00:15:16 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Aug 25 2017 - 00:15:16 CDT