Re: Unicode education in Schools

ECMAScript 6 fixed that, largely along the lines of my proposal:
http://norbertlindenberg.com/2012/05/ecmascript-supplementary-characters/index.html

Norbert

> On Aug 24, 2017, at 22:14 , Peter Constable via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org> wrote:
>
> I thought Javascript had a UCS-2 understanding of Unicode strings. Has it managed to progress beyond that?
>
>
>
>
>
> Peter
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Unicode [mailto:unicode-bounces_at_unicode.org] On Behalf Of David Starner via Unicode
> Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 5:18 PM
> To: Unicode Mailing List <unicode_at_unicode.org>
> Subject: Fwd: Unicode education in Schools
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: David Starner <prosfilaes_at_gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, Aug 24, 2017, 6:16 PM
> Subject: Re: Unicode education in Schools
> To: Richard Wordingham <richard.wordingham_at_ntlworld.com>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017, 5:26 PM Richard Wordingham via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org> wrote:
>
> Just steer them away from UTF-16! (And vigorously prohibit the very
> concept of UCS-2).
>
> Richard.
>
>
>
> Steer them away from reinventing the wheel. If they use Java, use Java strings. If they're using GTK, use strings compatible with GTK. If they're writing JavaScript, use JavaScript strings. There's basically no system without Unicode strings or that they would be better off rewriting the wheel.
>
Received on Sat Aug 26 2017 - 04:59:48 CDT