Re: Greek tonos question

From: Geoffrey P. Waigh (gwaigh@teklogix.interlog.com)
Date: Fri Feb 23 1996 - 10:11:00 EST

Next message: Mark Leisher: "Re: Greek tonos question"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Greek tonos question"
Maybe in reply to: Mark Leisher: "Greek tonos question"
Next in thread: Mark Leisher: "Re: Greek tonos question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

While we are on the topic of Greek Tonos, I was wondering about the
decompositions listed for some of the characters in 1.1. The 1.0
GREEK NON-SPACING TONOS (U+0384) was unified with
COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE (U+030D) in 1.1, and U+0384 changed to a
spacing tonos character.
The various greek letters precomposed with tonos marks are listed as being
decomposed with U+0384 which seems inconsistent with all the other
decompositions. Is there a good reason for this?

Thanks,

Geoffrey Waigh
gwaigh@teklogix.interlog.com

Next message: Mark Leisher: "Re: Greek tonos question"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Greek tonos question"
Maybe in reply to: Mark Leisher: "Greek tonos question"
Next in thread: Mark Leisher: "Re: Greek tonos question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:30 EDT