>I think that the code tables that document the next edition of ISO/IEC
>10646-1 and Unicode 3.0 should look the same. Asmus Freytag had volunteered
>to produce the code tables for the next edition of ISO/IEC 10646 (and
>Unicode). With reference to my previous message about the format of the
>code tables for planes 01 to 10 including both the UCS-4 and UTF-16
>surrogate notation, it would be easier for the readers (and Asmus) if the
>Unicode and 10646 tables looked the same.
Yes, but there aren't going to be any non-BMP characters in either Unicode
3.0 or the next edition of 10646 (unless I've missed something, which isn't
impossible).
=====
John H. Jenkins
jenkins@apple.com
tseng@blueneptune.com
http://www.blueneptune.com/~tseng
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:42 EDT