Otto Stolz wrote:
> So I have been told, many times. But this does not explain why
> the old orthography demanded a hyphenation of "ck" (as in Zuk-
> ker") in contrast to the ban on hyphenating "st" (as in "Gelü-
> ste").
Would German lead type fonts have had a "c" by itself? I would think
that "ch" and "ck" would do the whole job, given that all stand-alone
"c"s are equivalent to "z"s.
-- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn. You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn. Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:47 EDT