Re: Umlaut and diaeresis

From: John Cowan (cowan@locke.ccil.org)
Date: Tue Jun 22 1999 - 12:20:27 EDT

Next message: Jeroen Hellingman: "Re: Umlaut and diaeresis"
Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: New German orthography"
Maybe in reply to: Michael Everson: "Umlaut and diaeresis"
Next in thread: Lars Henrik Mathiesen: "Re: Umlaut and diaeresis"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Otto Stolz wrote:

> Just to avoid a possible misunderstanding: The standard does not say
> "in names" but rather "in Namensverzeichnissen" (in lists of proper
> names, aka. rolls).

In other words, so that the Muellers sort with the Müllers, but
not near the (nonexistent?) Mullers?

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@ccil.org
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

Next message: Jeroen Hellingman: "Re: Umlaut and diaeresis"
Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: New German orthography"
Maybe in reply to: Michael Everson: "Umlaut and diaeresis"
Next in thread: Lars Henrik Mathiesen: "Re: Umlaut and diaeresis"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:47 EDT