Re: dotless j

From: John Cowan (cowan@locke.ccil.org)
Date: Sun Jul 04 1999 - 19:44:14 EDT

Next message: Kermit Software Support: "Re: Plain text: Amendment 1"
Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: dotless j"
Maybe in reply to: Luke Stevens: "dotless j"
Next in thread: Curtis Clark: "Re: dotless j"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Curtis Clark scripsit:

> Okay, a fifth way. An "expert set" font with a dotless j, so that combined
> diacriticals won't look dorky. *Now* am I getting it?

Just so. The font's intelligence would say "Use 'j' glyph except when
constructing an accented character; then use "dotlessj" glyph."

-- 
John Cowan                                   cowan@ccil.org
       I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin

Next message: Kermit Software Support: "Re: Plain text: Amendment 1"
Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: dotless j"
Maybe in reply to: Luke Stevens: "dotless j"
Next in thread: Curtis Clark: "Re: dotless j"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:48 EDT