Re: dotless j

From: Jeroen Hellingman (jehe@kabelfoon.nl)
Date: Mon Jul 05 1999 - 16:58:22 EDT


The problem with putting Indian script conjunct characters and ligatures
in the character coding will not solve the problem. Each font can have a
different way of how glyphs are put together to render a certain sequence of
characters, so, the mapping of characters-to-glyph is really dependent on
the font, influenced by such things as design (sometimes you can re-use
the standing bar of a-matra in devanagari for the right most part of quite a
lot of letters, saving a lot of full letter glyphs in the font)

Ofcourse you can put a load of glyphs somewhere, but will it be helpful to
font designers? I doubt, because not all font designers want to create all
exotic glyphs, for example, for conjuncts required in Sanskrit only.

Jeroen

-----Original Message-----
>You also don't want to add all the conjunct characters used in
>Indian scripts...

I would be happy to put them in plane 17 or something so we could have a
unified glyph space (i.e. AFII) with permanent character-to-glyph mapping
vectors. That would be helpful to many font implementors.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:48 EDT