Re: Unicode top 100 (was RE: Unicode 3.0 press statements)

From: N.R.Liwal (liwal@liwal.net)
Date: Wed Jan 26 2000 - 13:08:43 EST


Dear Mr. Marco;

In case of UNICODE we are talking of SCRIPT
and LANGUAGES, "not dialects". A language may have
100 dialects, but use one or rearely two scripts,
like Malay.

Thanks.

Liwal
----- Original Message -----
From: <Marco.Cimarosti@icl.com>
> Liwal wrote:
> >The 18 Million figure for Pashto Speakers is wrong.
> >The actual Estimate is more then 45 millions, I do not know who
> >are making the wrong calculations. I Sugget amendment to this
> r>ecords.
>
> I apologize with everybody for that silly idea: please allow me to
*RETREAT*
> the proposal.
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:58 EDT