Re: PUA

From: John Cowan (jcowan@reutershealth.com)
Date: Tue Feb 22 2000 - 16:35:22 EST

Next message: Peter Constable: "Re: PUA"
Previous message: Rick McGowan: "Re: PUA"
Maybe in reply to: James E. Agenbroad: "PUA"
Next in thread: Peter Constable: "Re: PUA"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Rick McGowan wrote:

> The PUA is more like a National Forest than a City Park. Just say "Heck
> No!" to all proposals for any semi-official, proposed, semi-standardized,
> rationalized, regulated, or recommended usage of the private use area. Leave
> it alone and let people run freely with wild abandon through the trees...

Well, let's not overdo it here. I *recommend* that if you are writing
with an artificial script (including, but not limited to, one used
for writing an artificial language) that you contact Michael Everson
and/or me to obtain a registration of the characters thereof.

-- 
Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis vom dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)

Next message: Peter Constable: "Re: PUA"
Previous message: Rick McGowan: "Re: PUA"
Maybe in reply to: James E. Agenbroad: "PUA"
Next in thread: Peter Constable: "Re: PUA"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:59 EDT