RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional

From: Michael Everson (everson@egt.ie)
Date: Thu Oct 05 2000 - 06:16:21 EDT

Next message: Sandeep Krishna: "Diff between UCS-2 and UTF-16"
Previous message: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: do all browsers support UTF-8 encoding???"
Maybe in reply to: Steven R. Loomis: "Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional"
Next in thread: Thomas Chan: "RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Ar 08:58 -0800 2000-10-04, scríobh Carl W. Brown:

>[I]f I am using the Gaelic Latin script are there
>differences such as collating sequences?

Yes, but chiefly because there are orthographic differences as well.

Michael Everson ** Everson Gunn Teoranta ** http://www.egt.ie
15 Port Chaeimhghein Íochtarach; Baile Átha Cliath 2; Éire/Ireland
Vox +353 1 478 2597 ** Fax +353 1 478 2597 ** Mob +353 86 807 9169
27 Páirc an Fhéithlinn; Baile an Bhóthair; Co. Átha Cliath; Éire

Next message: Sandeep Krishna: "Diff between UCS-2 and UTF-16"
Previous message: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: do all browsers support UTF-8 encoding???"
Maybe in reply to: Steven R. Loomis: "Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional"
Next in thread: Thomas Chan: "RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:14 EDT