Re: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, etc?

From: Bob Hallissy (bob_hallissy@sil.org)
Date: Thu Oct 05 2000 - 07:21:41 EDT

Next message: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Diff between UCS-2 and UTF-16"
Previous message: Sandeep Krishna: "Diff between UCS-2 and UTF-16"
Maybe in reply to: Elaine Keown: "lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, etc?"
Next in thread: Markus Scherer: "Re: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, etc?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Platform specific encoding ID: 10 --- really? Have values 7,
8, and 9 also been defined?

Bob

-------------------------------

       From: <apurvaj@microsoft.com> AT Internet on 04-10-2000 00:34

       Format 12 (segmented coverage) is required for surrogate fonts
       on Windows.

Such a font will need to contain a cmap subtable with:

       Platform ID: 3
       Platform specific encoding ID:10
       Format: 12 (segmented coverage)

Next message: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Diff between UCS-2 and UTF-16"
Previous message: Sandeep Krishna: "Diff between UCS-2 and UTF-16"
Maybe in reply to: Elaine Keown: "lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, etc?"
Next in thread: Markus Scherer: "Re: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, etc?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:14 EDT