Re: Kana and Case (was [totally OT] Unicode terminology)

From: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (michka@trigeminal.com)
Date: Wed Nov 22 2000 - 15:44:56 EST

Next message: 11digitboy@bolt.com: "Re: Kana and Case (was [totally OT] Unicode terminology)"
Previous message: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: Kana and Case (was [totally OT] Unicode terminology)"
Maybe in reply to: Thomas Chan: "Re: Kana and Case (was [totally OT] Unicode terminology)"
Next in thread: 11digitboy@bolt.com: "Re: Kana and Case (was [totally OT] Unicode terminology)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> I don't get what you mean by "new code pages". Who's creating those
> anymore?

Actually, lots of people, unfortunately. From WG3 and the endless parades of
8859 codepages, to WG01 of INFITT, to the now [in]famous GB-18030, there are
lots of code pages being researched, created, modified, and otherwise used.

michka

a new book on internationalization in VB at
http://www.i18nWithVB.com/

Next message: 11digitboy@bolt.com: "Re: Kana and Case (was [totally OT] Unicode terminology)"
Previous message: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: Kana and Case (was [totally OT] Unicode terminology)"
Maybe in reply to: Thomas Chan: "Re: Kana and Case (was [totally OT] Unicode terminology)"
Next in thread: 11digitboy@bolt.com: "Re: Kana and Case (was [totally OT] Unicode terminology)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:15 EDT