At 19:50 +0430 2001-04-04, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
>I noted that, but the point is that it's not a unique sign for
>international use. It's only a compatiblity character, and it will be used
>only in "legacy" Persian texts that are converted from ISIRI 3342 (which
>has its own bidi, with only three categories: Left-to-right,
>Right-to-left, and Persian Number).
What's this mean? That in Word 200x, with full Persian support, you
would not use a unitary code point for the rial sign, but instead you
expect users only to type the four letters that make up the word?
>And then it made its way into the national standard character set. And now
>we need it for round-trip. And we do want to discourage its use in all
>ways (unless unavoidable), and we want to mark it as deprecated in all
>ways.
Then your solution is that your round-trip is achieved by a mapping
table that maps one-to-many and many-to-one depending on direction.
-- Michael Everson ** Everson Gunn Teoranta ** http://www.egt.ie 15 Port Chaeimhghein Íochtarach; Baile Átha Cliath 2; Éire/Ireland Mob +353 86 807 9169 ** Fax +353 1 478 2597 ** Vox +353 1 478 2597 27 Páirc an Fhéithlinn; Baile an Bhóthair; Co. Átha Cliath; Éire
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:17:15 EDT