Unicode Mail List Archive
By Author

Starting: Sun Apr 01 2001 - 00:46:13 EST
Ending: Mon Apr 30 2001 - 23:05:36 EDT

• 11digitboy@bolt.com
  • Terminology questions (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 19:25:47 EDT)
  • Decimal Unicodepoints (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 00:04:00 EDT)
  • 21-bit unicode (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 11:48:12 EDT)
  • Re: FYI... (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 17:39:11 EDT)
  • The Code 2000 font. (Sat Apr 07 2001 - 00:56:53 EDT)
  • Too many Han (was: Re: How many noncharacters, unassigned and private area code points in 3.1.) (Fri Apr 06 2001 - 23:30:33 EDT)
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Tue Apr 03 2001 - 20:27:00 EDT)
• addison@inter-locale.com
  • RE: Unicode in a URL (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 12:38:14 EDT)
  • RE: How will software source code represent 21 bit unicode charac ters? (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 12:23:25 EDT)
• Andrew Cunningham
  • Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 23:26:17 EDT)
  • Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 23:08:39 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 03:08:58 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 03:12:46 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 21:34:58 EDT)
• Antoine Leca
  • Re: Digits in Unicode Names (Tue Apr 10 2001 - 05:14:42 EDT)
• Asmus Freytag
  • Re: Tags and the Private Use Area (Sun Apr 29 2001 - 04:09:45 EDT)
  • Re: Tags and the Private Use Area (Sun Apr 29 2001 - 02:38:30 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance... (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 23:42:44 EDT)
  • RE: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode) (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 18:19:32 EDT)
  • Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphics (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 15:23:00 EDT)
  • Fwd: Re: Byte Order Marks (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 17:00:33 EDT)
  • Re: Identifiers (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 03:43:11 EDT)
• Ayers, Mike
  • UTF-8 on this list (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 16:21:27 EDT)
  • FW: IDS question (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 13:51:02 EDT)
  • RE: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Us e Area (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 11:48:30 EDT)
  • RE: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Us e Area (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 16:27:57 EDT)
  • ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode) (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 12:31:10 EDT)
  • RE: benefits of unicode (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 19:37:35 EDT)
  • RE: benefits of unicode (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 15:09:30 EDT)
  • RE: 21-bit unicode (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 14:43:07 EDT)
  • RE: benefits of unicode (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 15:04:57 EDT)
  • RE: Reviewing IETF documents (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 12:18:50 EDT)
  • RE: Ruby Annotation and XHTML 1.1 are W3C Proposed Recommendation s (Wed Apr 11 2001 - 12:02:43 EDT)
• Becker, Joseph
  • FW: Learn more about Windows XP's international features (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 12:32:26 EDT)
• Berthold Frommann
  • Re: Ruby Annotation and XHTML 1.1 are W3C Proposed Recommendation s (Wed Apr 11 2001 - 16:22:19 EDT)
  • Re: Ruby Annotation and XHTML 1.1 are W3C Proposed Recommendations (Wed Apr 11 2001 - 16:22:23 EDT)
  • Re: Mac OSX + 17,500 Kanji (Thu Apr 05 2001 - 10:20:58 EDT)
• Bhavdeep Singh, Gurgaon
  • Is my file UTF8 (Mon Apr 09 2001 - 07:58:15 EDT)
• Bob_Hallissy@sil.org
  • Re: three characters? (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 12:09:42 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 11:20:38 EDT)
  • RE: Unicode editing (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 08:27:37 EDT)
• Carl W. Brown
  • RE: Invalid char display (was: Using hex numbers considered a geek attitude) (Sat Apr 28 2001 - 12:12:56 EDT)
  • Invalid char display (was: Using hex numbers considered a geek attitude) (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 13:40:41 EDT)
  • RE: Unicode in a URL (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 20:31:07 EDT)
  • OT Porting to older OSes was RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 14:09:19 EDT)
  • RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 14:35:17 EDT)
  • RE: How will software source code represent 21 bit unicode charac ters? (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 13:40:55 EDT)
  • RE: Ruby Annotation and XHTML 1.1 are W3C Proposed Recommendations (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 18:06:47 EDT)
  • RE: Ruby Annotation and XHTML 1.1 are W3C Proposed Recommendations (Mon Apr 09 2001 - 13:00:28 EDT)
  • RE: OT obsolete symbols was: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 17:47:18 EDT)
  • RE: Putting unicode@unicode.org first (in the To:field) (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 14:13:02 EDT)
  • RE: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 11:17:15 EDT)
• Chris Pratley
  • RE: Word and Version 3.1 characters (Mon Apr 02 2001 - 07:20:23 EDT)
• Craig Ian Thomas
  • Japanese Font Support (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 08:17:01 EDT)
• Dave Schweisguth
  • Should I submit e with circumflex and macron/caron? (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 17:55:12 EDT)
• David Gallardo
  • New%20character%200370%20%28ORKIAN SMALL LETTER NANO NANO%29 (Sun Apr 01 2001 - 16:18:57 EDT)
• David J. Perry
  • Re: Classical Greek on a Mac (Tue Apr 03 2001 - 07:02:22 EDT)
• David Starner
  • Re: PC code pages and national character sets (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 23:04:14 EDT)
  • Re: PC code pages and national character sets (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 20:54:11 EDT)
  • Re: Tags and the Private Use Area (Sun Apr 29 2001 - 05:46:25 EDT)
  • Re: Tags and the Private Use Area (Sun Apr 29 2001 - 05:49:19 EDT)
  • Re: Tags and the Private Use Area (Sun Apr 29 2001 - 04:14:23 EDT)
  • Re: Using hex numbers cosidered a geek attitude (was; Re: Decimal Unicodepoints) (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 12:32:26 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode in a URL (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 14:14:41 EDT)
  • Re: Tags and the Private Use Area (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 15:43:59 EDT)
  • Re: Decimal Unicodepoints (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 02:09:54 EDT)
  • Re: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode) (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 16:42:12 EDT)
  • Re: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode) (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 15:24:56 EDT)
  • Re: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode) (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 14:17:00 EDT)
  • Re: Byte Order Marks (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 22:48:05 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 21:10:04 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 01:24:59 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 16:45:36 EDT)
  • Re: Identifiers (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 15:57:05 EDT)
  • Re: Identifiers (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 11:51:11 EDT)
  • Re: Identifiers (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 19:02:07 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 03:09:19 EDT)
  • Re: The Code2000 font. (Wed Apr 11 2001 - 12:06:55 EDT)
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 13:30:54 EDT)
• Dean A. Snyder
  • Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphics (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 15:52:49 EDT)
  • Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphics (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 15:30:31 EDT)
  • Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphics (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 10:20:15 EDT)
  • Re: compatible applications (Wed Apr 11 2001 - 10:57:09 EDT)
  • Re: Digits in Unicode Names (Fri Apr 06 2001 - 14:39:43 EDT)
  • Digits in Unicode Names (Fri Apr 06 2001 - 11:54:59 EDT)
• Dennis L. Goyette
  • Re: The Code2000 font. (Wed Apr 11 2001 - 12:02:24 EDT)
  • Re: The Code2000 font. (Wed Apr 11 2001 - 07:38:55 EDT)
  • Re: ucs in C and C++ (Wed Apr 11 2001 - 05:48:55 EDT)
  • Re: Digits in Unicode Names (Fri Apr 06 2001 - 14:51:16 EDT)
• Dennis L. Goyette Sr.
  • Displaying unicode..... (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 07:50:34 EDT)
• DougEwell2@cs.com
  • Re: UTF-8 on this list (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 23:11:46 EDT)
  • Re: Using hex numbers considered a geek attitude (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 11:43:54 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance... (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 11:53:17 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 11:53:03 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 11:30:26 EDT)
  • Re: Reviewing IETF documents (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 14:18:30 EDT)
  • Re: Identifiers (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 14:07:20 EDT)
  • Re: Reviewing IETF documents (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 14:45:35 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 01:43:25 EDT)
  • Re: Byte Order Marks (Tue Apr 10 2001 - 11:50:30 EDT)
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 11:43:35 EDT)
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Tue Apr 03 2001 - 21:35:28 EDT)
  • New%20character%20FB07%20%28LATIN%20SMALL%20LETTER%20LIGATURE%20SMALL%20CT%29&bo (Sun Apr 01 2001 - 20:01:31 EDT)
• Edward Cherlin
  • RE: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode) (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 18:26:43 EDT)
  • [OT]Gutenberg (was Re: Hacking the pyramids (Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode))) (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 00:25:11 EDT)
  • Unicode motivation/horror stories (was RE: benefits of unicode) (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 19:23:15 EDT)
  • RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 16:17:19 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 15:35:31 EDT)
  • RE: benefits of unicode (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 21:20:58 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 14:34:02 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 19:21:01 EDT)
  • Range error (Fri Apr 06 2001 - 14:36:34 EDT)
  • Unihan errors (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 22:26:21 EDT)
  • Quoting quota considered harmful (Sun Apr 01 2001 - 01:46:28 EST)
• Elliotte Rusty Harold
  • Re: Decimal Unicodepoints (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 11:37:00 EDT)
• Emil Herıak
  • one question (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 20:59:00 EDT)
• Eric Muller
  • Re: Tags and the Private Use Area (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 19:52:14 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 16:57:59 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance... (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 19:08:46 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 18:10:04 EDT)
• F. Avery Bishop
  • RE: Why win32 ANSI api does not work with Indic Scripts? (Wed Apr 11 2001 - 15:56:04 EDT)
• Florian Weimer
  • Re: Identifiers (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 14:37:26 EDT)
  • Re: Reviewing IETF documents (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 14:13:04 EDT)
  • Re: Reviewing IETF documents (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 14:05:31 EDT)
  • Re: Identifiers (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 06:09:42 EDT)
  • Re: Identifiers (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 06:04:59 EDT)
  • Re: Reviewing IETF documents (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 05:56:16 EDT)
  • Re: Identifiers (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 05:30:39 EDT)
  • Re: Reviewing IETF documents (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 17:51:02 EDT)
  • Re: Reviewing IETF documents (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 17:42:58 EDT)
  • Identifiers (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 14:10:55 EDT)
  • Reviewing IETF documents (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 14:15:18 EDT)
• Frank da Cruz
  • Re: Invalid char display (was: Using hex numbers considered a geek attitude) (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 14:56:43 EDT)
• Gaute B Strokkenes
  • Re: Putting unicode@unicode.org first (in the To:field) (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 23:26:46 EDT)
• Giles, Suzanne
  • RE: [OT]Gutenberg (was Re: Hacking the pyramids (Re: Latin w/ dia critics (was Re: benefits of unicode))) (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 05:04:59 EDT)
• Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • Re: Characters not Glyphs (Was Re: Reviewing IETF documents) (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 05:18:47 EDT)
  • Re: Reviewing IETF documents (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 14:32:26 EDT)
  • Re: Reviewing IETF documents (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 13:04:53 EDT)
• J M Sykes
  • Re: [OT]Gutenberg (was Re: Hacking the pyramids (Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode))) (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 05:45:21 EDT)
• James Kass
  • Re: Terminology questions (Tue May 01 2001 - 00:15:04 EDT)
  • Re: Tags and the Private Use Area (Sun Apr 29 2001 - 08:39:33 EDT)
  • Re: Tags and the Private Use Area (Sun Apr 29 2001 - 04:26:18 EDT)
  • Re: Tags and the Private Use Area (Sat Apr 28 2001 - 20:44:23 EDT)
  • Re: three characters? (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 06:46:10 EDT)
  • Re: three characters? (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 02:59:56 EDT)
  • Re: three characters? (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 20:29:21 EDT)
  • Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphics (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 16:58:51 EDT)
  • Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphics (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 12:59:15 EDT)
  • Egyptian Hieroglyphics (was Re: Latin w/ diacritics) (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 06:39:51 EDT)
  • Pahawh Hmong (was re: Latin w/diacritics) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 17:30:25 EDT)
  • Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 14:51:03 EDT)
  • Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 13:01:48 EDT)
  • Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 11:30:56 EDT)
  • Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 08:28:27 EDT)
  • Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 08:18:15 EDT)
  • Re: (OT) Pyramid Blocks (was Latin w/ diacritics) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 06:37:40 EDT)
  • Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 05:07:24 EDT)
  • Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 01:09:00 EDT)
  • Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 22:02:16 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Sat Apr 14 2001 - 03:57:48 EDT)
  • Re: The Code2000 font. (Tue Apr 10 2001 - 11:00:09 EDT)
  • Re: Too many Han (was: Re: How many noncharacters, unassigned and private area code points in 3.1.) (Sat Apr 07 2001 - 06:32:25 EDT)
  • Re: How many noncharacters, unassigned and private area code points in 3.1. (Fri Apr 06 2001 - 21:25:33 EDT)
  • Re: Range error (OT Display Issue) (Fri Apr 06 2001 - 19:17:58 EDT)
  • Re: Classical Greek on a Mac (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 05:30:14 EDT)
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 05:16:30 EDT)
  • Re: Code2001 (RE: The Unicode Standard, Version 3.1) (Tue Apr 03 2001 - 07:15:18 EDT)
  • Re: Old Persian (Mon Apr 02 2001 - 05:14:30 EDT)
  • Re: The Unicode Standard, Version 3.1 (Sun Apr 01 2001 - 08:01:38 EDT)
• James Partridge
  • Re: Classical Greek on a Mac (Tue Apr 03 2001 - 09:10:23 EDT)
• jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com
  • RE: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode) (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 16:50:42 EDT)
  • RE: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode) (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 15:43:02 EDT)
  • RE: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode) (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 15:02:17 EDT)
  • RE: How will software source code represent 21 bit unicode charac ters? (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 10:29:06 EDT)
• Jeff Guevin
  • Re: converting unicode (UTF-8) on a Word document (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 15:00:06 EDT)
• Jim DeLaHunt
  • Re: 21 bit unicode and older computing equipment (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 17:28:51 EDT)
  • Re: Mac OSX + 17,500 Kanji (Thu Apr 05 2001 - 13:41:54 EDT)
  • Re: Mac OSX + 17,500 Kanji (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 14:41:05 EDT)
• John Cowan
  • Re: Tags and the Private Use Area (Sat Apr 28 2001 - 23:19:27 EDT)
  • Re: Tags and the Private Use Area (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 20:14:05 EDT)
  • Re: three characters? (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 20:52:41 EDT)
  • Re: Identifiers (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 06:53:12 EDT)
  • Re: [?UTF-8?][?UTF-8?] (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 23:23:01 EDT)
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: benefits of unicode] (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 18:51:43 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 17:13:05 EDT)
  • Re: Too many Han (was: Re: How many noncharacters, unassigned and private area code points in 3.1.) (Mon Apr 09 2001 - 11:50:16 EDT)
  • Re: Too many Han (was: Re: How many noncharacters, unassigned and private area code points in 3.1.) (Sat Apr 07 2001 - 17:25:23 EDT)
• John H. Jenkins
  • Pollard list set up (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 09:28:40 EDT)
  • Re: The Unicode Standard, Version 3.1 (Sun Apr 01 2001 - 14:15:26 EDT)
• John Hudson
  • Re: one question (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 00:43:12 EDT)
  • Re: Hacking the pyramids (Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits o f unicode)) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 13:26:43 EDT)
  • RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 13:20:15 EDT)
  • Re: Characters not Glyphs (Was Re: Reviewing IETF documents) (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 22:28:00 EDT)
  • Re: FW: Learn more about Windows XP's international features (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 15:52:05 EDT)
  • Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 22:57:53 EDT)
• John Jenkins
  • Re: Unihan errors (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 23:09:43 EDT)
  • Re: Classical Greek on a Mac (Tue Apr 03 2001 - 10:30:35 EDT)
• Jonathan Rosenne
  • RE: Unicode editing (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 13:47:59 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode editing (Sun Apr 22 2001 - 15:34:48 EDT)
  • RE: Unicode Bidi algorithm dissention (was: something else entirely) (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 01:12:28 EDT)
• Juliusz Chroboczek
  • Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 15:59:16 EDT)
  • Re: Displaying unicode..... (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 09:53:01 EDT)
• Jungshik Shin
  • Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 01:41:49 EDT)
  • Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 00:21:48 EDT)
  • RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 21:56:13 EDT)
  • Re: gb2312 (Tue Apr 10 2001 - 10:00:29 EDT)
  • Re: Displaying unicode..... (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 12:21:09 EDT)
  • Re: Japanese characters don't display in the title of a page. (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 08:56:21 EDT)
  • Re: Japanese display on Unix netscape ? (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 08:48:59 EDT)
• Karl Pentzlin
  • Using hex numbers cosidered a geek attitude (was; Re: Decimal Unicodepoints) (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 07:04:26 EDT)
• Keld Jĝrn Simonsen
  • Re: Unicode Collation Algorithm (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 18:13:26 EDT)
  • Re: Sun's Java encodings vs IANA's character set registry (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 18:10:58 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode Collation Algorithm (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 07:11:22 EDT)
  • ucs in C and C++ (Mon Apr 09 2001 - 12:54:55 EDT)
  • Re: Digits in Unicode Names (Fri Apr 06 2001 - 17:26:09 EDT)
• Kenneth Whistler
  • Re: Terminology questions (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 21:30:09 EDT)
  • Re: Terminology questions (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 20:49:01 EDT)
  • Re: Provenance of the Unicode Standard and of statements (derives from Re: Tags and the Private Use Area) (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 15:46:17 EDT)
  • Re: IDS question (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 14:33:38 EDT)
  • Re: Using hex numbers cosidered a geek attitude (was; Re: Decimal Unicodepoints) (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 15:12:35 EDT)
  • Re: Tags and the Private Use Area (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 20:40:22 EDT)
  • Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphics (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 15:36:28 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 15:15:01 EDT)
  • Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphics (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 17:48:04 EDT)
  • RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 15:49:06 EDT)
  • Hacking Unicode on DOS (was: RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode)) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 14:48:55 EDT)
  • Re: Identifiers (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 15:46:23 EDT)
  • Characters not Glyphs (Was Re: Reviewing IETF documents) (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 15:18:20 EDT)
  • Re: FYI... (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 19:48:12 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode Collation Algorithm (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 18:37:31 EDT)
• Lisa Moore
  • 18th Unicode Conference, April 2001, Hong Kong -- Final reminder (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 12:21:12 EDT)
• Lukas Pietsch
  • RichEdit v.4 common control in Win98? (Sat Apr 07 2001 - 07:01:15 EDT)
  • Re: Classical Greek on a Mac (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 03:56:04 EDT)
  • Re: Polytonic Greek (Tue Apr 03 2001 - 12:39:03 EDT)
• Magda Danish (Unicode)
  • FW: converting unicode (UTF-8) on a Word document (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 13:36:36 EDT)
  • FW: persian languge (Mon Apr 09 2001 - 16:18:57 EDT)
• Marc Durdin
  • Re: RichEdit v.4 common control in Win98? (Sat Apr 07 2001 - 09:17:39 EDT)
• Marc Wilhelm Küster
  • Re: Unicode savvy concordance software? (Sat Apr 14 2001 - 03:35:44 EDT)
• Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
  • Re: How will software source code represent 21 bit unicode characters? (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 13:08:47 EDT)
• Marco Cimarosti
  • RE: Using hex numbers cosidered a geek attitude (was; Re: Decimal Unicodepoints) (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 09:01:59 EDT)
  • RE: Unicode editing (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 05:13:53 EDT)
  • RE: Unicode editing (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 12:54:30 EDT)
  • RE: On the possibility of guidance... (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 10:31:36 EDT)
  • RE: On the possibility of guidance... (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 10:11:16 EDT)
  • RE: On the possibility of guidance... (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 07:52:32 EDT)
  • RE: Decimal Unicodepoints (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 04:27:44 EDT)
  • RE: On the possibility of guidance... (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 13:23:41 EDT)
  • RE: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Us e Area (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 08:22:30 EDT)
  • RE: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Us e Area (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 05:18:43 EDT)
  • RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 05:36:10 EDT)
  • RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 15:03:42 EDT)
  • RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 12:59:23 EDT)
  • Hacking the pyramids (Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits o f unicode)) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 11:03:24 EDT)
  • RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 10:10:31 EDT)
  • RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 06:49:23 EDT)
  • RE: How will software source code represent 21 bit unicode charac ters? (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 04:20:14 EDT)
  • Repha (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 12:01:48 EDT)
  • RE: benefits of unicode (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 04:17:49 EDT)
  • RE: Unicode editing (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 12:39:02 EDT)
  • RE: Unicode editing (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 10:34:25 EDT)
  • RE: Unicode editing (Wed Apr 11 2001 - 10:56:46 EDT)
  • RE: gb2312 (Tue Apr 10 2001 - 08:37:26 EDT)
  • RE: The Code 2000 font. (Tue Apr 10 2001 - 04:58:13 EDT)
  • RE: Why win32 ANSI api does not work with Indic Scripts? (Tue Apr 10 2001 - 04:15:16 EDT)
  • RE: Code charts (Tue Apr 10 2001 - 03:41:27 EDT)
  • RE: Too many Han (was: Re: How many noncharacters, unassigned and private area code points in 3.1.) (Mon Apr 09 2001 - 05:38:29 EDT)
  • RE: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Thu Apr 05 2001 - 13:07:23 EDT)
  • RE: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Thu Apr 05 2001 - 09:30:07 EDT)
  • RE: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Thu Apr 05 2001 - 05:11:31 EDT)
  • RE: OT obsolete symbols was: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 14:28:41 EDT)
  • RE: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 10:03:25 EDT)
  • RE: Thanks... (Tue Apr 03 2001 - 13:07:50 EDT)
  • Code2001 (RE: The Unicode Standard, Version 3.1) (Tue Apr 03 2001 - 05:18:37 EDT)
• Marco Piovanelli
  • Classical Greek on a Mac (Tue Apr 03 2001 - 05:14:13 EDT)
• Marion Gunn
  • Putting unicode@unicode.org first (in the To:field) (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 12:24:30 EDT)
• Mark D.K. Whistler
  • The Unicode Standard, Version 4.0 (Sun Apr 01 2001 - 11:52:20 EDT)
• Mark Leisher
  • Re: Unicode savvy concordance software? (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 15:57:36 EDT)
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 10:40:40 EDT)
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 10:34:25 EDT)
• Markus Scherer
  • Re: Unicode in a URL (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 14:28:33 EDT)
  • ICU charset mapping table collection online (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 18:03:05 EDT)
  • Re: Byte Order Marks (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 13:40:09 EDT)
  • Re: Byte Order Marks (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 21:24:47 EDT)
  • Re: Byte Order Marks (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 13:12:16 EDT)
  • Re: Sun's Java encodings vs IANA's character set registry (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 14:32:16 EDT)
• Martin Duerst
  • RE: Unicode in a URL (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 23:05:27 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode in a URL (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 21:44:48 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode in a URL (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 21:33:00 EDT)
  • RE: Unicode in a URL (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 22:00:45 EDT)
  • RE: How will software source code represent 21 bit unicode characters? (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 12:14:25 EDT)
  • Re: Reviewing IETF documents (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 03:54:45 EDT)
  • Re: Identifiers (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 20:24:20 EDT)
  • RE: Ruby Annotation and XHTML 1.1 are W3C Proposed Recommendations (Tue Apr 10 2001 - 21:49:25 EDT)
  • Ruby Annotation and XHTML 1.1 are W3C Proposed Recommendations (Sun Apr 08 2001 - 23:13:00 EDT)
• Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
  • Re: PC code pages and national character sets (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 23:39:14 EDT)
  • Re: PC code pages and national character sets (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 22:06:50 EDT)
  • Cutting to the chase (was Re: Tags and the Private Use Area) (Sat Apr 28 2001 - 16:19:45 EDT)
  • Re: Tags and the Private Use Area (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 15:23:36 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance... (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 14:18:40 EDT)
  • Re: XML encoding problem? (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 08:17:17 EDT)
  • Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 02:44:30 EDT)
  • Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 01:23:52 EDT)
  • Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 23:18:05 EDT)
  • Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 12:52:44 EDT)
  • Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 09:16:06 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 18:10:20 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode Bidi algorithm dissention (was: something else entirely) (Sat Apr 14 2001 - 17:28:56 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 23:33:29 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 19:20:12 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 18:58:50 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 18:40:01 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 17:47:01 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 23:43:45 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 23:32:22 EDT)
  • Re: Why win32 ANSI api does not work with Indic Scripts? (Wed Apr 11 2001 - 18:06:54 EDT)
  • Re: RichEdit v.4 common control in Win98? (Sat Apr 07 2001 - 15:01:03 EDT)
  • Re: RichEdit v.4 common control in Win98? (Sat Apr 07 2001 - 09:46:41 EDT)
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Thu Apr 05 2001 - 09:36:47 EDT)
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Thu Apr 05 2001 - 07:42:35 EDT)
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 00:16:15 EDT)
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 00:55:26 EDT)
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 00:19:55 EDT)
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 00:18:57 EDT)
• Michael Everson
  • RE: On the possibility of guidance... (Sun Apr 29 2001 - 18:05:19 EDT)
  • Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphics (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 15:50:52 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance... (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 15:20:41 EDT)
  • Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphics (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 09:47:20 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 12:51:46 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 11:12:03 EDT)
  • Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphics (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 13:34:02 EDT)
  • Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 12:25:23 EDT)
  • Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 09:28:24 EDT)
  • Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 06:50:20 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 04:44:42 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 11:33:55 EDT)
  • RE: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Thu Apr 05 2001 - 00:35:00 EDT)
  • RE: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 19:56:34 EDT)
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 15:05:21 EDT)
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 12:36:25 EDT)
• Mike Brown
  • RE: PC code pages and national character sets (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 20:31:35 EDT)
  • RE: Unicode in a URL (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 14:05:06 EDT)
  • RE: Unicode in a URL (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 21:09:48 EDT)
  • RE: How will software source code represent 21 bit unicode charac ters? (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 13:28:51 EDT)
  • RE: Sun's Java encodings vs IANA's character set registry (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 12:54:40 EDT)
  • Sun's Java encodings vs IANA's character set registry (Wed Apr 11 2001 - 20:59:48 EDT)
• Mike Lischke
  • RE: The Unicode Standard, Version 4.0 (Sun Apr 01 2001 - 12:55:17 EDT)
• Misha Wolf
  • FW: Vietnam IT Forum @ Stanford (Sun Apr 29 2001 - 21:43:39 EDT)
  • Re: Invalid char display (was: Using hex numbers considered a geek attitude) (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 21:48:43 EDT)
• N.R.Liwal
  • Re: three characters? (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 02:00:47 EDT)
  • Re: one question (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 10:57:50 EDT)
• Neil Shadrach
  • Unicode Collation Algorithm (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 05:34:02 EDT)
• Nelson H. F. Beebe
  • RE: Digits in Unicode Names (Fri Apr 06 2001 - 20:14:54 EDT)
• Nesbitt, Gavin
  • Unicode savvy concordance software? (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 14:54:29 EDT)
• Nick NICHOLAS
  • RE: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 15:24:44 EDT)
• Ollikainen, Jari
  • XML encoding problem? (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 04:07:47 EDT)
• Otto Stolz
  • Re: Unicode savvy concordance software? (Tue Apr 10 2001 - 17:20:43 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode savvy concordance software? (Thu Apr 05 2001 - 12:25:40 EDT)
  • Re: Classical Greek on a Mac (Tue Apr 03 2001 - 15:23:47 EDT)
• Patrick Andries
  • How many noncharacters, unassigned and private area code points in 3.1. (Fri Apr 06 2001 - 19:32:27 EDT)
• Patrick T. Rourke
  • Polytonic Greek (Tue Apr 03 2001 - 10:47:09 EDT)
• Paul Deuter
  • RE: Unicode in a URL (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 18:02:24 EDT)
  • RE: Unicode in a URL (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 12:16:42 EDT)
  • Unicode in a URL (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 22:41:07 EDT)
• Peter_Constable@sil.org
  • Re: Tags and the Private Use Area (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 18:45:44 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 12:25:24 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 18:52:45 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance... (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 17:49:05 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 17:30:40 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance... (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 18:17:43 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 17:42:34 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 07:28:29 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the PrivateUse Area (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 16:15:08 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 15:31:58 EDT)
  • Re: one question (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 09:09:08 EDT)
  • Re: 21-bit unicode (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 13:20:17 EDT)
  • Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 12:06:27 EDT)
  • Re: Hacking the pyramids (Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits o f unicode)) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 11:56:25 EDT)
  • RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 11:48:23 EDT)
  • Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 11:35:15 EDT)
  • RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 11:28:52 EDT)
  • Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 09:40:49 EDT)
  • Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 15:41:08 EDT)
  • Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 15:45:14 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 15:04:26 EDT)
  • Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 21:44:44 EDT)
  • Re: Should I submit e with circumflex and macron/caron? (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 21:37:30 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 09:30:34 EDT)
  • quoting (was Re: benefits of unicode (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 09:36:24 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 09:38:59 EDT)
  • Re: RichEdit v.4 common control in Win98? (Sun Apr 08 2001 - 20:56:27 EDT)
  • Re: RichEdit v.4 common control in Win98? (Sat Apr 07 2001 - 14:12:29 EDT)
  • Re: Putting unicode@unicode.org first (in the To:field) (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 13:22:13 EDT)
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 12:07:12 EDT)
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 12:03:41 EDT)
  • Re: The Unicode Standard, Version 3.1 (Mon Apr 02 2001 - 09:25:21 EDT)
  • Re: Word and Version 3.1 characters (Mon Apr 02 2001 - 09:31:13 EDT)
• Poulos,Stephen
  • compatible applications (Wed Apr 11 2001 - 09:18:04 EDT)
• Rajesh.Bhatia@baypackets.com
  • Internationalization Problem (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 11:16:11 EDT)
• Richard Kunst
  • RE: Unicode savvy concordance software? (Fri Apr 06 2001 - 11:50:53 EDT)
• Rick McGowan
  • Re: Provenance of the Unicode Standard and of statements (Sat Apr 28 2001 - 14:26:26 EDT)
  • Re: Tags and the Private Use Area (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 20:07:00 EDT)
  • Re: Tags and the Private Use Area (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 17:34:53 EDT)
  • Re: Tags and the Private Use Area (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 12:16:43 EDT)
  • Re: three characters? (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 17:27:08 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the PrivateUse Area (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 14:10:00 EDT)
  • Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphics (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 15:58:10 EDT)
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 18:31:08 EDT)
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 16:34:34 EDT)
  • Re: RE: The Unicode Standard, Version 4.0 (Sun Apr 01 2001 - 15:25:30 EDT)
  • Form posted from Mozilla (Sun Apr 01 2001 - 15:19:38 EDT)
• Robert Brady
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 12:20:27 EDT)
• root
  • Re: Identifiers (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 23:00:05 EDT)
• Roozbeh Pournader
  • Re: three characters? (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 14:57:26 EDT)
  • RE: On the possibility of guidance... (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 11:01:22 EDT)
  • RE: On the possibility of guidance... (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 10:18:31 EDT)
  • RE: On the possibility of guidance... (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 09:59:32 EDT)
  • Re: three characters? (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 01:02:41 EDT)
  • Re: three characters? (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 00:57:27 EDT)
  • three characters? (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 17:18:23 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Sat Apr 14 2001 - 16:12:28 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode Collation Algorithm (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 13:24:25 EDT)
  • 3.1 code charts (Mon Apr 09 2001 - 07:04:36 EDT)
  • Re: [unicode] Re: Unicode editing (Fri Apr 06 2001 - 20:42:24 EDT)
  • RE: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Thu Apr 05 2001 - 09:34:38 EDT)
  • RE: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 21:39:25 EDT)
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 18:06:05 EDT)
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 16:52:48 EDT)
  • RE: Putting unicode@unicode.org first (in the To:field) (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 15:37:09 EDT)
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 14:57:09 EDT)
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 14:10:19 EDT)
  • RE: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 12:34:51 EDT)
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 12:02:02 EDT)
  • RE: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 11:20:41 EDT)
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 07:06:45 EDT)
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 06:34:26 EDT)
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 06:30:54 EDT)
  • Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 06:29:39 EDT)
  • Iranian Rial sign proposal (Tue Apr 03 2001 - 19:09:31 EDT)
• Sarasvati
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance... (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 17:43:46 EDT)
  • FYI... (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 13:07:37 EDT)
• Sebastian Hagedorn
  • Re: compatible applications (Wed Apr 11 2001 - 10:28:03 EDT)
  • Re: Classical Greek on a Mac (Tue Apr 03 2001 - 06:47:28 EDT)
  • Re: Unicode in PDF files (Mon Apr 02 2001 - 13:57:19 EDT)
• Shigeki Moro
  • Re: Ruby Annotation and XHTML 1.1 are W3C Proposed Recommendation s (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 04:01:31 EDT)
• Suzanne M. Topping
  • Benefits/Microsoft Statement (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 14:52:27 EDT)
  • RE: Why win32 ANSI api does not work with Indic Scripts? (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 09:37:14 EDT)
• Teruhiko Kurosaka
  • PC code pages and national character sets (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 17:38:47 EDT)
• Tex Texin
  • [Fwd: Re: Benefits/Microsoft Statement] (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 16:04:43 EDT)
  • Re: Reviewing IETF documents (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 22:31:58 EDT)
  • Re: Reviewing IETF documents (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 16:58:52 EDT)
  • Re: Reviewing IETF documents (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 17:01:34 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 19:21:17 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 18:53:31 EDT)
  • [Fwd: Re: benefits of unicode] (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 18:12:14 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 18:04:01 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 17:11:33 EDT)
  • RE: benefits of unicode (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 10:46:36 EDT)
  • Re: benefits of unicode (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 00:06:03 EDT)
  • [Fwd: benefits of unicode] (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 23:44:08 EDT)
  • benefits of unicode (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 23:12:40 EDT)
  • Re: Putting unicode@unicode.org first (in the To:field) (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 16:42:02 EDT)
• Thomas Chan
  • Re: FW: IDS question (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 14:54:36 EDT)
  • IDS question (Sat Apr 28 2001 - 12:13:51 EDT)
  • Re: Using hex numbers cosidered a geek attitude (was; Re: Decimal Unicodepoints) (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 22:55:43 EDT)
• Timothy Partridge
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 18:50:00 EDT)
• Tomas McGuinness
  • Byte Order Marks (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 08:58:09 EDT)
  • gb2312 (Tue Apr 10 2001 - 06:09:45 EDT)
  • Byte Order Marks (Tue Apr 10 2001 - 05:49:58 EDT)
  • RE: Code charts (Mon Apr 09 2001 - 07:35:46 EDT)
  • Code charts (Mon Apr 09 2001 - 05:48:52 EDT)
• TOYOSHIMA,Masayuki
  • Re: PC code pages and national character sets (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 18:49:27 EDT)
• Vaintroub, Wladislav
  • RE: Code charts (Mon Apr 09 2001 - 07:00:29 EDT)
• Vladimir Ivanov
  • Old Persian (Mon Apr 02 2001 - 01:17:47 EDT)
• William Overington
  • Provenance of the Unicode Standard and of statements (derives from Re: Tags and the Private Use Area) (Sat Apr 28 2001 - 10:50:03 EDT)
  • Re: Tags and the Private Use Area (Sat Apr 28 2001 - 10:44:51 EDT)
  • Re: Tags and the Private Use Area (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 11:47:03 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 10:39:25 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 06:14:21 EDT)
  • Tags and the Private Use Area (derives from On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area) (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 06:45:12 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 06:40:24 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 07:54:23 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 07:54:27 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance... (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 07:54:07 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 07:54:16 EDT)
  • On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 09:45:21 EDT)
  • Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 03:13:57 EDT)
  • How will software source code represent 21 bit unicode characters? (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 02:33:16 EDT)
  • 21 bit unicode and older computing equipment (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 02:55:16 EDT)
  • Re: The Unicode Standard, Version 3.1 (Sun Apr 01 2001 - 06:13:43 EDT)
• Winkler, Arnold F
  • RE: The Unicode Standard, Version 4.0 (Sun Apr 01 2001 - 19:22:55 EDT)
• Wm Seán Glen
  • Re: Provenance of the Unicode Standard and of statements (Sat Apr 28 2001 - 19:35:54 EDT)
  • Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 13:59:09 EDT)
• Yves Arrouye
  • RE: Byte Order Marks (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 04:15:24 EDT)
  • RE: Byte Order Marks (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 04:12:50 EDT)
  • RE: Byte Order Marks (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 16:52:25 EDT)
  • RE: How will software source code represent 21 bit unicode charac ters? (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 14:56:07 EDT)
  • RE: How will software source code represent 21 bit unicode charac ters? (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 11:29:58 EDT)
  • RE: Identifiers (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 19:36:14 EDT)
  • RE: Identifiers (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 17:49:51 EDT)
  • RE: Identifiers (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 16:41:58 EDT)
  • RE: Identifiers (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 11:12:07 EDT)
  • RE: Identifiers (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 11:09:58 EDT)
  • RE: Identifiers (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 19:06:26 EDT)
  • RE: benefits of unicode (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 19:34:28 EDT)
  • RE: Sun's Java encodings vs IANA's character set registry (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 22:44:41 EDT)
  • RE: Digits in Unicode Names (Fri Apr 06 2001 - 18:52:59 EDT)

Last message date: Mon Apr 30 2001 - 23:05:36 EDT
Archived on: Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:17:16 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:17:16 EDT