Re: The Code2000 font.

From: James Kass (jameskass@worldnet.att.net)
Date: Tue Apr 10 2001 - 11:00:09 EDT

Next message: Martin Duerst: "RE: Ruby Annotation and XHTML 1.1 are W3C Proposed Recommendations"
Previous message: DougEwell2@cs.com: "Re: Byte Order Marks"
In reply to: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: The Code 2000 font."
Next in thread: Dennis L. Goyette: "Re: The Code2000 font."
Reply: Dennis L. Goyette: "Re: The Code2000 font."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Marco Cimarosti wrote about the Code2000 font, and
so did 11digitboy.

There is room for improvement in the font and I will
consider your helpful comments.

I'll respond to specific issues off-list and request that
anyone who wants to discuss the font's merits and/or
shortcomings contact me privately.

Best regards,

Next message: Martin Duerst: "RE: Ruby Annotation and XHTML 1.1 are W3C Proposed Recommendations"
Previous message: DougEwell2@cs.com: "Re: Byte Order Marks"
In reply to: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: The Code 2000 font."
Next in thread: Dennis L. Goyette: "Re: The Code2000 font."
Reply: Dennis L. Goyette: "Re: The Code2000 font."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:17:15 EDT