Michael,
Isn't this covered by the second benefit on the page?
Reduced development costs, etc....
tex
"Michael (michka) Kaplan" wrote:
> It DOES, however, underscore the fact that Unicode support is so much easier
> than supporting every random code page that the only reasonable way vendors
> can keep up with every single market is to have a good story for Unicode
> support.
>
> Certainly if there is no business case for a company like Microsoft or IBM
> or Progress (<g>) to support a particular non-standard code page, but then
> Unicode supports the script, then suddenly there is an avenue to support the
> script, right?
>
> michka
-- According to Murphy, nothing goes according to Hoyle. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tex Texin Director, International Business mailto:Texin@Progress.com +1-781-280-4271 Fax:+1-781-280-4655 Progress Software Corp. 14 Oak Park, Bedford, MA 01730 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sign up now for PROGRESS Worldwide Exchange 2001-Jun-03..07, Washington DC. http://www.progress.com/exchange
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:17:16 EDT