On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 03:14:23AM -0500, David Starner wrote:
> Why? For HTTP, all it would take is a line like
> "Content-Unicode-PUA: Klingon; ref=http://www.kli.org/klingon.xml"
> where http://www.kli.org/klingon.xml is the definition.
>
> Considering the amount of stuff a web 0 has to support, I don't
^^^^ browser
> see why this would be a 0 cost for anyone. Nothing says lynx
^^^ huge
> or Opera has to support it, but the heavyweight browser (IE, Mozilla)
> wouldn't have any reason not to.
>
> > Therefore, communities that share a well
> > defined set of characters are better off if they can be standardized.
>
> Well, duh. From the 0 to this thread, I don't think there's
^^^ responses
[Misspelled words were replaced with 0's, through a local mishap. I
guess they weren't misspelled any more . . .]
-- David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org "I don't care if Bill personally has my name and reads my email and laughs at me. In fact, I'd be rather honored." - Joseph_Greg
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:17:16 EDT