Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo

From: James Kass (jameskass@worldnet.att.net)
Date: Sun Nov 18 2001 - 00:48:15 EST

Previous message: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "It's part history and part convenient reference (was Re: Why have planes?"
In reply to: James Kass: "Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo"
Next in thread: Tex Texin: "Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

James Kass wrote,

> Still haven't been able to display non-BMP text in MSIE on W2K here.

Plane Two displays in MSIE 5.00 on W2K, once a Plane Two font
is, uh, installed.

Plane One doesn't.

Best regards,

James Kass.

Previous message: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "It's part history and part convenient reference (was Re: Why have planes?"
In reply to: James Kass: "Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo"
Next in thread: Tex Texin: "Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Nov 18 2001 - 00:53:45 EST