James Kass scripsit:
> Even if a new character is proposed and accepted, font developers
> will probably just copy their own interpretation of 'missing
> character' from Glyph ID Zero into the new slot. What would
> be gained?
It would be guaranteed that every font would encode this character
using its missing-glyph glyph; in short, no font would have a mapped glyph
for the character, but it is a legitimate character in every other way.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn.
You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn.
Clear all so! `Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Aug 01 2002 - 22:16:00 EDT