Re: newbie: unicode (when used as a coding) = UTF16LE?

From: Tom Gewecke (tom@bluesky.org)
Date: Thu Feb 13 2003 - 13:13:55 EST

Next message: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: traditional vs simplified chinese"

Previous message: Andrew C. West: "Re: traditional vs simplified chinese"
Maybe in reply to: Zhang Weiwu: "newbie: unicode (when used as a coding) = UTF16LE?"
Next in thread: Stefan Persson: "Re: newbie: unicode (when used as a coding) = UTF16LE?"
Reply: Stefan Persson: "Re: newbie: unicode (when used as a coding) = UTF16LE?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

>As a matter of interest, what browsers actually support UTF-16?

For Mac OS X, all except Safari and Internet Explorer I think. At least
they have it on their encoding menus.

Next message: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: traditional vs simplified chinese"
Previous message: Andrew C. West: "Re: traditional vs simplified chinese"
Maybe in reply to: Zhang Weiwu: "newbie: unicode (when used as a coding) = UTF16LE?"
Next in thread: Stefan Persson: "Re: newbie: unicode (when used as a coding) = UTF16LE?"
Reply: Stefan Persson: "Re: newbie: unicode (when used as a coding) = UTF16LE?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Feb 13 2003 - 14:20:06 EST