Re: newbie: unicode (when used as a coding) = UTF16LE?

From: Stefan Persson (alsjebegrijptwatikbedoel@yahoo.se)
Date: Thu Feb 13 2003 - 14:02:18 EST

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Unicode 4.0 Beta - Glyphs of proposed addition of Characters in Gujarati"

Previous message: Markus Scherer: "Re: newbie: unicode (when used as a coding) = UTF16LE?"
In reply to: Tom Gewecke: "Re: newbie: unicode (when used as a coding) = UTF16LE?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Tom Gewecke wrote:

>>As a matter of interest, what browsers actually support UTF-16?
>>
>>
>For Mac OS X, all except Safari and Internet Explorer I think. At least
>they have it on their encoding menus.
>
Internet Explorer for Windows supports UTF-16, but only if the browser
identifies the encoding automatically. There is no way to force IE to
change the encoding to UTF-16.

Stefan

_____________________________________________________
Gratis e-mail resten av livet på www.yahoo.se/mail
Busenkelt!

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Unicode 4.0 Beta - Glyphs of proposed addition of Characters in Gujarati"
Previous message: Markus Scherer: "Re: newbie: unicode (when used as a coding) = UTF16LE?"
In reply to: Tom Gewecke: "Re: newbie: unicode (when used as a coding) = UTF16LE?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Feb 13 2003 - 14:51:31 EST