Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Wed Jun 25 2003 - 15:21:36 EDT

Next message: Jim Allan: "Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels"

Previous message: John Hudson: "Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels"
In reply to: John Hudson: "Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels"
Next in thread: John Cowan: "Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 12:15 -0700 2003-06-25, John Hudson wrote:

>In this case, any existing normalisation for Hebrew is already
>broken -- in the sense of destroying Biblical Hebrew text -- but
>still the argument from the UTC seems to be that even broken
>implementations -- broken because the standard is broken -- must not
>be broken.

That seems very short-sighted indeed.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Jim Allan: "Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels"
Previous message: John Hudson: "Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels"
In reply to: John Hudson: "Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels"
Next in thread: John Cowan: "Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 25 2003 - 16:15:18 EDT