Re: Nicest UTF

From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (qrczak@knm.org.pl)
Date: Fri Dec 03 2004 - 16:19:04 CST

Next message: Peter Constable: "RE: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"

Previous message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Nicest UTF"
In reply to: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Nicest UTF"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: Nicest UTF"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

"Philippe Verdy" <verdy_p@wanadoo.fr> writes:

> Decoding SCSU is very straightforward,

But not for random access by code point index, which is needed by many
string APIs.

-- 
   __("<         Marcin Kowalczyk
   \__/       qrczak@knm.org.pl
    ^^     http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/

Next message: Peter Constable: "RE: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"
Previous message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Nicest UTF"
In reply to: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Nicest UTF"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: Nicest UTF"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Dec 03 2004 - 16:22:26 CST