RE: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)

From: Gary P Grosso (ggrosso@arbortext.com)
Date: Tue Dec 07 2004 - 14:26:09 CST

Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Nicest UTF.. UTF-9, UTF-36, UTF-80, UTF-64, ..."

Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Unicode for words?"
Maybe in reply to: Gary P. Grosso: "RE: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Thanks to Peter Constable, John Hudson, Tom Gewecke, Christopher Fynn, and others, for taking the time to address my question.

Gary

---
Gary Grosso
Arbortext, Inc.
Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Nicest UTF.. UTF-9, UTF-36, UTF-80, UTF-64, ..."
Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Unicode for words?"
Maybe in reply to: Gary P. Grosso: "RE: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Dec 07 2004 - 14:29:12 CST