From: Peter Kirk (peterkirk@qaya.org)
Date: Wed Dec 22 2004 - 05:59:27 CST
On 22/12/2004 07:07, Doug Ewell wrote:
>Philippe Verdy <verdy underscore p at wanadoo dot fr> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Unicode defines only 4 *standard* normalization forms (NFC, NFD, NFKC,
>>NFKD), but other *non-standard* normalization forms are possible:
>>
>>
>
>But should not be used. It can be tricky enough getting the four
>standard ones right as it is.
>
>
>
There are very good reasons for using "non-standard normalisation forms"
when the standard ones are irretrievably broken, as for pointed Hebrew
which simply cannot be rendered unless ordered or reordered in a
non-standard way.
-- Peter Kirk peter@qaya.org (personal) peterkirk@qaya.org (work) http://www.qaya.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 22 2004 - 11:16:16 CST