RE: Arabic encoding model (alas, static!)

From: Peter Constable (petercon@microsoft.com)
Date: Wed Jul 06 2005 - 13:56:34 CDT

  • Next message: John Hudson: "Re: Arabic encoding model (alas, static!)"

    > From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org]
    On
    > Behalf Of Dean Snyder

    > Please list for us here some of the most significant decisions
    ISO/IEC/
    > JTC1/SC2 and its Working Group 2 have taken that went against
    > recommendations of the UTC.
    >
    > In addition, since 1992, let's say, give us your best estimate as to
    the
    > percentage of decisions ISO has made that went against UTC
    > recommendations compared to all the decisions ISO made.

    I don't know the answer to these questions. I wonder, though, what the
    intent of the question is. Suppose there has *never* been an instance in
    which WG2 rejected a UTC recommendation. What would you derive from
    that?

    Peter Constable

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 13:57:16 CDT