RE: Windows Glyph Handling

From: Peter Constable ([email protected])
Date: Thu Aug 25 2005 - 08:06:29 CDT

Next message: Peter Constable: "RE: Windows Glyph Handling"

Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: ISO 639-3 beta input form (was: Questions re ISO-639-1,2,3)"
Next in thread: Peter Constable: "RE: Windows Glyph Handling"
Maybe reply: Peter Constable: "RE: Windows Glyph Handling"
Reply: Christopher Fynn: "Re: Windows Glyph Handling"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On
> Behalf Of Christopher Fynn

> Is OpenType really being "Standardized" (or just becoming a standard
> font format) and what exactly does this mean?

Yes; that is happening within the ISO/IEC committee responsible for
MPEG.

> Will the specs for shaping each complex script (now kind of a separate
> appendix to the OpenType specification and currently determined by
> Microsoft) be part of this standard?

No.

Peter Constable

Next message: Peter Constable: "RE: Windows Glyph Handling"
Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: ISO 639-3 beta input form (was: Questions re ISO-639-1,2,3)"
Next in thread: Peter Constable: "RE: Windows Glyph Handling"
Maybe reply: Peter Constable: "RE: Windows Glyph Handling"
Reply: Christopher Fynn: "Re: Windows Glyph Handling"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Aug 25 2005 - 08:08:52 CDT