RE: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?

From: Cary Karp (ck@nic.museum)
Date: Wed Dec 07 2005 - 00:45:49 CST

Next message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?"

Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?"
Maybe in reply to: Deborah Goldsmith: "CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?"
Next in thread: Raymond Mercier: "Re: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

>> And why I tend to favour yyyy-mm-dd (AFAIK, nobody ever uses yyyy-dd-mm).
>
> This format is the one normally used in Sweden. I believe it is also used in
> Japan and a few other countries, as well.

yyyy-mm-dd that is :-)

Next message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?"
Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?"
Maybe in reply to: Deborah Goldsmith: "CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?"
Next in thread: Raymond Mercier: "Re: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 07 2005 - 03:19:12 CST