From: Peter Constable (petercon@microsoft.com)
Date: Wed Dec 20 2006 - 19:17:44 CST
I was working from fallible memory: I thought we had registered zh-nan prior to completion of rfc 4646 (when we registered zh-cmn). If we didn't, then that seems to me like a regrettable oversight.
Peter
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Addison Phillips [mailto:addison@yahoo-inc.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 4:48 PM
> To: Peter Constable
> Cc: unicode@unicode.org
> Subject: Re: Question about new locale language tags
>
> "zh-min-nan" is a grandfathered tag. There is nothing wrong with using
> it. To expect otherwise is unfair.
>
> I should note that this tag will be deprecated, for the reasons Peter cites.
>
> Addison
>
> Peter Constable wrote:
> > Given that "min" is the ISO 639 ID for a Philippine language, Minangkabau, which is
> quite unrelated to Chinese, "zh-min-nan..." would be a bit of a non-sequitor.
> >
> > This is not the only case in which Wikipedia is doing the wrong thing wrt language
> tags.
> >
> >
> > Peter Constable
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org] On
> Behalf
> >> Of Philippe Verdy
> >> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 11:26 AM
> >> To: vunzndi@vfemail.net; Arne Götje (???)
> >> Cc: Addison Phillips; unicode@unicode.org; Andrew Lee
> >> Subject: Re: Question about new locale language tags
> >>
> >> From: <vunzndi@vfemail.net>
> >>>> According to this the following should be approriate:
> >>>> zh-nan-Latn-TW (Minnan using Latin script in Taiwan, aka. POJ)
> >>>> zh-nan-Hant-TW (Minnan using traditional Hanzi in Taiwan)
> >> shouldn' it be
> >> * zh-min-nan-Latn-TW
> >> * zh-min-nan-Hant-TW
> >> i.e. with **two** extlang subtags?
> >>
> >> I note that Wikipedia currently uses "zh-min-nan" for Minnan (independantly of
> the
> >> script used or the geographic region), not "zh-nan" ; are there other "Min"
> variants?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Addison Phillips
> Globalization Architect -- Yahoo! Inc.
>
> Internationalization is an architecture.
> It is not a feature.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 20 2006 - 19:21:44 CST