RE: Sanskrit nasalized L

I see no necessity for ZWJ, but since ZWJ can be used to select “half” forms and this involves a half-form la, that’s a valid sequence.


Peter

From: unicode-bounce_at_unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce_at_unicode.org] On Behalf Of Vinodh Rajan
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 10:11 AM
To: Shriramana Sharma
Cc: Unicode Discussion List
Subject: Re: Sanskrit nasalized L

ल्‍ँल

LA + VIRAMA + ZWJ + CHANDRABINDU + LA

(BTW Without ZWJ ल्ँल)

V


On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa_at_gmail.com<mailto:samjnaa_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
On Monday 20 June 2011 12:54 AM, Peter Constable wrote:
Here's a related text element:
[cid:image001.png_at_01CC2E7B.B6DA0BA0]<mailto:[cid:image001.png_at_01CC2E7B.B6DA0BA0]>

That’s another that the original Uniscribe implementation didn’t allow but that we’ve become aware of as needing to be supported.


LA + VIRAMA + CANDRABINDU + LA

or

LA + CANDRABINDU + VIRAMA + LA

I personally feel the former is the "correct" one but would like to hear your views.

--
Shriramana Sharma



--
http://www.virtualvinodh.com
Received on Wed Jun 22 2011 - 00:51:03 CDT