On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 20:56, Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela_at_cs.tut.fi> wrote:
>
>
> I may have missed some parts of the discussion, but I don’t see why you
> couldn’t just use the zero-width non-joiner. Using it may cause risks of its
> own, but at least you would be dealing with risks related to the original
> problem.
>
> Jukka
>
>
I would also think that ZWNJ is more safe and appropriate than CGJ.
Szabolcs
Received on Sun Jul 03 2011 - 02:44:53 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 03 2011 - 02:44:55 CDT